• October 4, 2013

    nivo slider image nivo slider image nivo slider image nivo slider image nivo slider image nivo slider image

    Jane Freilicher: Painter Among Poets

    The painter Jane Freilicher met poet John Ashbery in New York City in 1949. A the time she lived upstairs from Kenneth Koch, who would become known—along with Ashbery, Frank O’Hara, and James Schuyler—as a member of the New York School Poets. Though best known as wrters, all four members of the New York School were deeply interested in art (Ashbery and Schuyler went on to be art critics, and O’Hara worked at MoMA). By the early 1950s they had become part of a group associated with the Tibor de Nagy Gallery, which included painters such as Larry Rivers, Fairfield Potter, and Freilicher. As friendships between the writers and artists developed, so did an impressive sense of genre-crossing inspiration: Painters portrayed poets, and poets wrote about painters. Some, such as Joe Brainard, who arrived later, would become both a painter and a poet—and a frequent artistic collaborator to boot.)

    Tibor de Nagy recently focused on one particular artist and her poet peers in the spectacular show Jane Freilicher: Painter Among Poets. The resulting catalogue features reproductions of Freilicher’s landscapes and still lifes, all of which have, like the New York School poets’ work, a beguiling mix of intensity, intelligence, and apparent ease. Here, we also find portraits of Schuyler, O’Hara, Ashbery, and Koch. This alone would be a treat, but the writing—reproductions of letters written, and poems about Freilicher (e.g. Schuyler’s “Looking Forward to Seeing Jane Real Soon”)—bring the sense of friendship, gossip, and idea-swapping to the forefront. As a writer, Freilicher is charming, insightful about her work, and a true wit. As Ashbery writes to her in a 1960 letter: “Dear Jane, Your letter came yesterday and it is already required reading in my set—Harry Mathews and Kenneth Koch both fell under the table in the restaurant where we all ate last night while reading it.”

  • “Is monster erotica lucrative?” New York Magazine talks to two Texas college students who have made more than mid-career accountants and engineers at Boeing by writing adult novels with titles like Taken By the T-Rex and Ravished by the Triceratops.

    At the Page Turner blog, Adelle Waldman considers why (and how) novelists fail to adequately address the subject of female beauty.

    The new, all digital Newsweek is staffing up, and they’ve already poached some good writers, including Jezebel’s Katie Baker and the New York Times’s Karla Zabludovsky.

    A real book.

    A real book.

    Dave Eggers released a statement this week in response to accusations that he plagiarized the conceit of Kate Losse’s memoir The Boy Kings, which detailed her years as an early employee at Facebook. In an email to Gawker, Eggers said, ”I’ve just heard about the claims of Kate Losse that my novel, The Circle, was somehow based on a work of nonfiction she wrote. I want to make it clear that I have never read and have never heard of her book before today. I did not, in fact, read any books about any internet companies, or about the experiences of anyone working at any of these companies, either before or while writing The Circle.”

    A new law in France will prevent Amazon.fr from shipping discounted new books to customers for free. The regulation is an amendment to a 1981 law that mandates that all new books must be sold at a fixed price.

    Once again, Jonathan Franzen is railing against social media. This week, Franzen returned to his favorite topic during a BBC radio interview, describing social media as a “coercive development.” He remarked, “What I find particularly alarming from the point of view of American fiction is that… agents will now tell young writers: ‘I won’t even look at your manuscript if you don’t have 250 followers on Twitter.’” Franzen added, “I see people who ought to be spending their time developing their craft, and people who used to be able to make a living as freelance writers, I see them making nothing and coerced into this constant self-promotion.”